Arizona

  Annuity Lawyers.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
August 24, 2010
Annuity-Law
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Arizona Annuity News

 

Armed Services Committee Improves Veterans Survivor Benefit Plan

Survivor Benefits Legislation Added to Defense Bill, Eliminates “Widow’s Tax” 
  
 WASHINGTON, D.C. - Congressman Jim Saxton (NJ-3rd), whose Third Congressional District has the most veterans in New Jersey, today hailed reforms of the Survivor Benefit Plan, (SBP) the annuity plan for survivors of military retirees. The provisions passed the House Armed Services Committee last night.

“Service members and survivors who signed up for the program will finally see some significant improvements to the SBP,” said Saxton. “We worked on this late into the evening and came up with the one of the most significant program improvements in the history of the SBP.”

The House Armed Services Committee approved eliminating the Social Security offset under the SBP by increasing the annuities paid to survivors of military retirees who are 62 or older. The SBP provision was included in H.R. 4200, the Fiscal Year 2005 National Defense Authorization Act, which was passed by the Committee late last evening.

There are approximately 43,000 veterans in Burlington County, 59,000 in Ocean County and 40,000 in Camden County.

“We pushed for its inclusion in the 2005 Defense Authorization Act,” Saxton said. “It appears that we finally will fix the major inequity of the Survivor Benefit Plan.”

Lee Lange, Deputy Director of Government Relations at the Military Officers Association of America, praised the House for acting to right a longstanding unfairness, calling it “a major development.”

”This is truly a remarkable turn of events,” Lange said. “We are stunned and we couldn’t be more pleased.”

The SBP, established in 1972, provides a monthly income to the surviving spouse of a military retiree who chooses to participate. The retiree accepts reduced retired pay in exchange for an annuity that would benefit the surviving spouse upon the retiree’s death. Currently the surviving spouse would receive 55% of the deceased’s retired pay until age 62 when the spouse would receive 35 percent due to the Social Security offset.

Many of these survivors were never told about this annuity cut and the unexpected loss of income can be financially devastating. The 20 percent reduction does not match what was promised and provided to survivors of other federal retirees.

Restoring equity requires an increase in the SBP annuity. The legislation would eliminate the Social Security offset under SBP and increase the annuities paid to survivors of military retirees who are 62 or older from 35 percent of retired pay to the percentages indicated for the following periods:

• (1)        For months after September 2005 and before April 2006:  40 percent
• (2)        For months after March 2006 and before April 2007:  45 percent
• (3)        For months after March 2007 and before April 2008:  50 percent
• (4)        For months after March 2008: 55 percent

Restoring SBP equity over this period will cost approximately $2 billion. The bill, H.R. 4200, will head to the House floor next week.

Saxton has worked for years to improve SBP. In 1998, Saxton cosponsored a bill H.R. 3107, which was incorporated in the 1999 National Defense Authorization Act and signed into law. As passed, participants who have been enrolled in the SBP for 30 years and have reached the age of 70 can enter a “paid-up” status, whereby they would stop paying further SBP premiums and continue to receive SBP benefits for their survivors in the event of their death. The effective date of this provision, however, is delayed until October 1, 2008.  Saxton then introduced an SBP reform bill in 2003, H.R. 1653, to rectify the delayed effective date.  Currently, this bill has garnered 48 cosponsors.

Contact a Arizona annuity lawyer today and get a free consultation!

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
The federal law that establishes the basic requirements for employee benefit plans. The authority for administering and enforcing ERISA is divided among three federal agencies: The Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the Department of Labor (DOL), and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC).

 


  Newsroom  
 


Latest news about Annuity cases in Arizona and nationwide:

Botetourt Woman Pleads Guilty To Mail Fraud And Money Laundering
United States Attorney John L. Brownlee announced today that Monica Yates, age 40, of Daleville, Virginia, pleaded guilty to one count each of mail...
Read more >


Former Massachusetts Insurance Broker Sentenced For Fraud And Money Laundering
Joseph P. Garvey was sentenced to 71 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release for money laundering and mail fraud. Garvey wa...
Read more >


Carnahan Cracks Down In Variable Annuity Case
Jefferson city, Missouri -- Secretary of State Robin Carnahan's Commissioner of Securities, Matt Kitzi, recently issued a consent order involving a...
Read more >


More Annuity News >

 
 

Annuity Lawyers.com Terms

 


Today's Terms

Market Rate of Interest

Definition:
The percentage of interest paid on certain FERS deposits and refunds. Based on the average interest earned by the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund in the previous year. In 1998, the interest rate is 6.75%.

Immediate annuity

Definition:
An annuity that begins no later than one month after the date the insurance would otherwise stop An annuity under 5 CFR 842.204(a)(1) for which the starting date has been postponed under 5 CFR 842.204.

Option C

Definition:
Coverage, to insure your spouse and eligible child(ren), that you can elect in addition to Basic insurance. You can elect up to 5 multiples of the coverage amounts (each multiple equals $5,000 for a spouse and $2,500 for an eligible child). Also called family optional insurance.

More Annuity Lawyers.com Terms >

 

Annuity Law Resources

 


Search Annuity Law resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

 

Annuity Law Hot Topics

 
Topics Related to Annuity:

  • Client Manipulation
  • Providing False Information
  • Lying to Auditors
  • Unauthorized Transactions
  • Breach of Fiduciary Duty
  • Broker Embezzlement

More Annuity Law Topics >

Arizona Annuity-Law Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Annuity-Law attorney you should contact our Annuity-Law Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Apache Junction
  • Avondale
  • Buckeye
  • Bullhead City
  • Casa Grande
  • Cave Creek
  • Chandler
  • Chino Valley
  • Cottonwood
  • Douglas
  • Flagstaff
  • Florence
  • Fountain Hills
  • Gilbert
  • Glendale
  • Green Valley
  • Kingman
  • Lake Havasu City
  • Mesa
  • Nogales
  • Paradise Valley
  • Payson
  • Peoria
  • Phoenix
  • Prescott Valley
  • Safford
  • Scottsdale
  • Sierra Vista
  • Somerton
  • Sun City
  • Sun City West
  • Surprise
  • Tempe
  • Tucson
  • Yuma


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Arizona Annuity Lawyers.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.